L-1A Sustained — Information Technology (2021): the petitioner provided additional evidence and arguments

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided additional evidence and arguments on appeal that successfully established the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial capacity. The initial denial was based on the Director's finding that the beneficiary would not be employed as a function manager or a personnel manager, but the AAO concluded that the petitioner met the 'preponderance of evidence' standard on appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF