sustained L-1A Case: Logistics
Decision Summary
The initial decision was denied because the Director concluded the beneficiary's proposed U.S. position did not qualify as managerial or executive. The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully established that the beneficiary would serve as a 'function manager,' primarily managing the company's essential supply chain operations at a senior level with discretion, rather than directly performing the tasks of the function.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF G-USA, INC. Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: SEPT. 18, 2019 APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, an intermediate bulk container leasing and logistics company , seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a regional supply chain manager under the L-lA nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(L), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(L). The L-lA classification allows a business to transfer a qualifying foreign employee to the United States to temporarily work in a managerial or executive capacity. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition , concluding that the record did not establish, as required, that the Beneficiary's U.S. position qualifies as managerial or executive position. On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the Beneficiary will serve as a function manager in the United States . Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. To establish eligibility for the L-lA nonimmigrant visa classification, a qualifying organization must have employed the beneficiary "in a capacity that is managerial , executive, or involves specialized knowledge," for one continuous year within three years preceding the beneficiary's application for admission into the United States. Section 101(a)(l5)(L) of the Act. In addition, the beneficiary must seek to enter the United States temporarily to continue rendering his or her services to the same employer or a subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a managerial or executive capacity. Id. "Managerial capacity" means an assignment within an organization in which the employee primarily manages the organization, or a department, subdivision, function, or component of the organization; supervises and controls the work of other supervisory , professional , or managerial employees, or manages an essential function within the organization , or a department or subdivision of the organization; has authority over personnel actions or functions at a senior level within the organizational hierarchy or with respect to the function managed; and exercises discretion over the day-to-day operations of the activity or function for which the employee has authority. Section 101(a)(44)(A) of the Act. The statutory definition of"managerial capacity" allows for both "personnel managers" and "function managers." See sections 101(a)(44)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act. The term "function manager" applies generally when a beneficiary does not supervise or control the work of a subordinate staff but instead is primarily responsible for managing an "essential function" within the organization. See section Matter of G-USA, Inc. 10l(a)(44)(A)(ii) of the Act. If a petitioner claims that a beneficiary will manage an essential function, it must clearly describe the duties to be performed in managing the essential function. In addition, the petitioner must demonstrate that: (1) the function is a clearly defined activity; (2) the function is "essential," i.e., core to the organization; (3) the beneficiary will primarily manage, as opposed to perform, the function; ( 4) the beneficiary will act at a senior level within the organizational hierarchy or with respect to the function managed; and ( 5) the beneficiary will exercise discretion over the function's day-to-day operations. Matter of G- Inc., Adopted Decision 2017-05 (AAO Nov. 8, 2017). Here, the Petitioner has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Beneficiary will serve as a function manager in the United States. It has meaningfully described his duties as regional supply chain manager; it has clearly defined the supply chain operations function that is essential to its global operations; it has established that the Beneficiary will primarily manage its supply chain operations in North America as opposed to performing the function; it has established that the Beneficiary will act at a senior level with respect to the function managed; and it has established that the Beneficiary will exercise discretion over the day-to-day operations of its supply chain operations in North America. The Petitioner has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Beneficiary will serve as a function manager in the United States. We will therefore sustain the appeal. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter of G-USA, Inc., ID# 5845993 (AAO Sept. 18, 2019) 2
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.