L-1A Sustained — Marketing (2021): the petitioner provided sufficient clarifying evidence on

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided sufficient clarifying evidence on appeal. The petitioner successfully demonstrated that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial capacity by distinguishing the beneficiary's role from his subordinates, highlighting his authority over a key marketing function, and showing his discretionary control over a multi-million dollar budget.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF