sustained
L-1A
sustained L-1A Case: Poultry Breeding
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, concluding the Beneficiary would perform non-qualifying operational duties and be a first-line supervisor. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding sufficient evidence that the Beneficiary would primarily perform managerial duties, oversee professional subordinates, and exercise discretion over daily operations within the new office's first year.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity New Office Requirements Supervision Of Professional Employees Primary Duties Vs. Non-Qualifying Operational Tasks
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
MATTER OF H-N-A-, LLC
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office
DATE: NOV. 30.2017
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER
The Petitioner, a poultry breeding and distribution company, seeks to temporarily employ the
Beneficiary as the president and secretary of its new office 1 under the L-1 A nonimmigrant
classification for intracompany transferees. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section
101(a)(15)(L), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(L). The L-1A classification allows a corporation or other
legal entity (including its atliliate or subsidiary) to transfer a qualifying foreign employee to the
United States to work temporarily in a managerial or executive capacity.
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition. concluding that the record did not
establish, as required, that the Beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity
within one year of the approval of the new office petition.
On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the preponderance of the
evidence demonstrates that the Beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying executive and
managerial capacity.
Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.
I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
To establish eligibility for the L-1 A nonimmigrant visa classification for a new office, a qualifying
organization must have employed the beneficiary in a managerial or executive capacity for one
continuous year within three years preceding the beneficiary"s application for admission into the
United States. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(1)(3 )(v)(B). In addition, the beneficiary must seek to enter the
United States temporarily to continue rendering his or her services to the same employer or a
subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a managerial or executive capacity. Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the
Act. The petitioner must also establish that the beneficiary·s prior education. training. and
employment qualifies him or her to perform the intended services in the United States. 8 C.F.R.
§ 214.2(1)(3).
1
The tenn "new office" refers to an organization which has been doing business in the United States for less than one
year. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(1)(1 )(ii)(F).
Matter of H-N-A-, LLC
If the Form l-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, indicates that the beneficiary is coming to
the United States in L-1 A status to open or to be employed in a new office. the petitioner must
submit evidence to demonstrate that the new office will be able to support a managerial or executive
position within one year. This evidence must establish that the petitioner secured sufficient physical
premises to house its operation and disclose the proposed nature and scope of the entity. its
organizational structure, its financial goals, and the size of the U.S. investment. See generally.
8 C.F.R. § 214.2(1)(3)(v).
II. U.S. EMPLOYMENT IN AN EXECUTIVE OR MANAGERIAL CAPACITY
The Director determined that the Petitioner did not establish that its new oftice would be able to
support a managerial or executive capacity. as defined at section 101 (a)( 44) of the Act within one
year of approval of the petition.
Specifically, the Director concluded that the Beneficiary's proposed job description reflects that he
would be primarily engaged in non-qualifying operational duties. Specifically, the Director
referenced the Beneficiary's responsibilities for "'human resources planning and management" as
"secretarial" duties. The Director also pointed to the Petitioner's organizational chart and stated that
it indicated that the Beneficiary would be only a first-line supervisor of non-professional employees.
rather than a managerial or executive employee.
Upon review, we disagree with the Director's assessment of the Beneficiary's job description and
the Petitioner's proposed staffing and structure. The Petitioner has submitted sutTicient evidence to
demonstrate that the Beneficiary would more likely than not be employed in a managerial capacity
within one year.
The statutory definition of "managerial capacity'' allows for both "personnel managers·· and
"function managers.'' See section 101 (a)( 44)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act. Personnel managers are
required to primarily supervise and control the work of other supervisory. professionaL or
managerial employees. Contrary to the common understanding of the word "'manager:· the statute
plainly states that a "first line supervisor is not considered to be acting in a managerial capacity
merely by virtue of the supervisor's supervisory duties unless the employees supervised are
professional." Section 101 (a)( 44 )(A)(iv) of the Act. If a beneficiary directly supervises other
employees, the beneficiary must also have the authority to hire and tire those employees. or
recommend those actions, and take other personnel actions. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(1)( 1 ){ii )(B)(J).
The Petitioner has submitted a detailed and credible duty description for the Beneficiary. Although
it appears likely that the Beneficiary may perform some non-qualifying operational tasks in his role
as president during the first year, the evidence is sutlicient to indicate that the Beneficiary will more
likely than not be primarily engaged in qualifying managerial tasks while supervising professional
subordinates within the first year. The Petitioner has provided sufficient evidence related to its first
year business plans and documentation indicating that it will take over substantial orders from a
distributor that formerly handled its sales and services related to poultry hatching. The record
2
Matter of H-N-A-, LLC
indicates that the Beneficiary will oversee professional subordinates with bachelor"s degrees and
substantial experience in the technical and scientific aspects of poultry hatching. In addition. the
Petitioner intends to hire an employee to perform administrative functions.
The evidence credibly establishes that the Beneficiary"s subordinates will relieve him from
performing non-qualifying operational and administrative tasks so that he can perform primarily
managerial duties. Further, the record demonstrates that the Beneficiary will manage the company.
have the authority to hire and fire statl~ and will exercise discretion over the Petitioner"s day-to-day
operations. See section 10l(a)(44)(A) ofthe Act.
III. CONCLUSION
The Petitioner has established that the Beneficiary would be employed in a managerial capacity
within one year of the approval of the petition.
ORDER: The appeal is sustained.
Cite as Matter of H-N-A-. LLC, ID# 767388 (AAO Nov. 30. 20 17) Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.