O-1A Dismissed โ Athletics (Swimming) (2015): did not establish sufficient evidence to satisfy at least
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy at least three of the regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. Additionally, the AAO determined that the proposed position of a swim instructor was not in the same area of extraordinary ability as the beneficiary's achievements as a competitive swimmer, as the two roles require different skill sets and the beneficiary had not established a history of coaching at a high level.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.