O-1A Dismissed โ Boxing (2015): did not establish the beneficiary, a professional boxer,
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary, a professional boxer, had achieved the necessary sustained national or international acclaim. The Director determined, and the AAO concurred, that the petitioner did not document a one-time major achievement or meet at least three of the eight alternative evidentiary criteria. The petitioner also failed to submit a promised brief or additional evidence on appeal to counter the initial denial.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.