O-1A Dismissed โ Cardiology (2023): did not establish the beneficiary met at least three of the
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO overturned the Director's finding on the 'judging' criterion, concluding that the evidence showed the beneficiary was invited to author articles rather than review the work of others. Since the petitioner only met the 'scholarly articles' criterion and did not successfully contest the denial of other criteria, they did not meet the minimum threshold for eligibility.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.