Dismissed
O-1A
O-1A Dismissed — Dog Handling (2005): the appeal was dismissed primarily because the petitioner
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed primarily because the petitioner failed to submit a mandatory consultation or advisory opinion from a peer group as required. The petitioner's central argument—that the dog's extraordinary ability should be imputed to the beneficiary (the handler)—was not accepted, and the appeal also failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact from the initial denial, leading to a summary dismissal.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Consultation/Advisory Opinion Extraordinary Ability Definition Failure To Identify Error On Appeal
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.