Dismissed
O-1A
O-1A Dismissed — Ecology: did not establish the beneficiary meets the evidentiary
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary meets the evidentiary criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The submitted evidence for awards, judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, and critical employment was found insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the beneficiary is at the very top of the field of ecology.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Receipt Of Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Scientific, Scholarly, Or Business-Related Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles In Professional Journals Or Other Major Media Employed In A Critical Or Essential Capacity For Organizations With A Distinguished Reputation
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.