O-1A Dismissed โ Martial Arts (2007): the petitioner argued the beneficiary, a Brazilian
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner argued the beneficiary, a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu coach, should be evaluated as an artist, which has a lower standard of 'distinction.' The AAO determined that coaching a sport falls under the 'athletics' category, which requires proving the beneficiary is at the very top of the field. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that martial arts should be considered an art form for immigration purposes, so the case was correctly evaluated under the stricter athletics criteria.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.