Dismissed
O-1A
O-1A Dismissed — Martial Arts (2015): the AAO agreed with the director that competitive taekwondo
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the AAO agreed with the director that competitive taekwondo and taekwondo coaching are not the same area of expertise. The beneficiary's achievements as a competitive athlete were from 1984-1987 and were not considered recent. The petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had sustained national or international acclaim that extended to her ability as a coach.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award At Least Three Of Eight Evidentiary Criteria Comparable Evidence Continuing To Work In The Area Of Extraordinary Ability
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.