Dismissed
O-1A
O-1A Dismissed — Medical Research (2010): although the petitioner submitted evidence under three
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because, although the petitioner submitted evidence under three regulatory criteria (judging, original contributions, and scholarly articles), the AAO found this evidence reflected routine duties and accomplishments. The AAO concluded that the evidence was not consistent with a finding of sustained national or international acclaim and did not demonstrate that the beneficiary had risen to the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally-Recognized Award Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.