O-1A Dismissed โ Motorsports Technology (2010): did not establish the beneficiary had achieved sustained
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had achieved sustained national or international acclaim and was one of the small percentage at the top of his field. The director initially denied the petition for failing to meet any of the regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO upheld this decision, finding the submitted evidence insufficient to prove the beneficiary's eligibility, despite the petitioner's arguments regarding the beneficiary's field and the consideration of comparable evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.