dismissed O-1A

dismissed O-1A Case: Physiotherapy

๐Ÿ“… Oct 11, 2024 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Physiotherapy

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the matter was considered moot. The petitioner had filed another nonimmigrant petition for the same beneficiary, which was subsequently approved, making the pursuit of the current appeal unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Receipt Of A Major, Internationally Recognized Award At Least Three Of Eight Possible Forms Of Documentation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: OCT. 11, 2024 In Re: 33613871 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Extraordinary Ability- 0) 
The Petitioner, an entertainment and management services business, seeks to classify the Beneficiary, 
a physiotherapist, as an individual of extraordinary ability. This 0-1 nonimmigrant visa classification 
is available to individuals who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national 
or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive 
documentation. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(O)(i), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(O)(i). 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding the Beneficiary had not 
satisfied the initial evidentiary criteria applicable to individuals of extraordinary ability in sciences, 
education, business, or athletics: either receipt of a major, internationally recognized award or at least 
three of eight possible forms of documentation . 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2( o )(3)(iii)(A)-(B) . The matter is now 
before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3. 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed another 
nonimmigrant petition I I on behalf of the Beneficiary, which the Director of the 
California Service Center approved on August 8, 2024, with a validity period until May 1, 2027. 
Accordingly, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.