O-1A Dismissed โ Polo (2007): the director initially denied the petition for failing to
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition for failing to submit a required peer group consultation and for failing to establish the beneficiary's sustained acclaim. Although the AAO found the petitioner did successfully submit an appropriate consultation from an expert in the field, it ultimately dismissed the appeal. The dismissal was based on the more involved issue of whether the beneficiary possessed the required extraordinary ability in athletics demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.