O-1A Dismissed โ Soccer Coaching (2022): did not establish the beneficiary met the minimum
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the minimum evidentiary requirement of at least three criteria. The AAO determined that the evidence did not prove the beneficiary's receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards, as coaching players or teams who competed in championships does not constitute a personal award for the coach under the regulations. Because the petitioner did not meet the initial threshold, the beneficiary was found ineligible for the O-1 classification.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.