O-1A Dismissed โ Table Tennis (2017): did not establish the beneficiary met the minimum of three
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the minimum of three required evidentiary criteria for an O-1 visa. The AAO determined that the evidence of awards and prizes was not sufficient to establish national or international recognition. Furthermore, the beneficiary's memberships in associations did not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts, and the published material about her was not from major media or professional trade publications.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.