O-1A Dismissed โ Tennis (2007): did not establish the beneficiary had achieved sustained
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had achieved sustained national or international acclaim as a tennis instructor or player. The evidence provided, such as a single team silver medal from several years prior and memberships in associations without proof of outstanding achievement criteria, was deemed insufficient to meet the regulatory standards for extraordinary ability. Furthermore, counsel failed to submit a brief or additional evidence on appeal as initially indicated.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.