Remanded
O-1A
O-1A Remanded — Business (2022): the AAO concluded the Director did not sufficiently
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO concluded the Director did not sufficiently consider the evidence the petitioner submitted to rebut a finding of willful misrepresentation. The Director's initial reason for denial, the petitioner's suspended corporate status in California, was found to be moot as the petitioner provided evidence of its reinstatement. The case was sent back for further consideration and a new decision on the merits.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Petitioner Corporate Status Willful Misrepresentation Contracts And Itineraries Sustained National Or International Acclaim
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.