sustained O-1A Case: Taekwondo
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director applied an incorrect legal standard by requiring the petitioner to establish that the proffered position requires a person of extraordinary ability, a finding the AAO withdrew. The director also failed to adequately discuss the evidence. Upon review, the AAO found the record sufficient to establish the beneficiary as an alien with extraordinary ability, concurring that she met the criteria for awards and published material.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.