Sustained
O-1A
O-1A Sustained โ Taekwondo (2006): the director applied an incorrect legal standard by
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director applied an incorrect legal standard by requiring the petitioner to establish that the proffered position requires a person of extraordinary ability, a finding the AAO withdrew. The director also failed to adequately discuss the evidence. Upon review, the AAO found the record sufficient to establish the beneficiary as an alien with extraordinary ability, concurring that she met the criteria for awards and published material.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Receipt Of Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations Which Require Outstanding Achievements Published Material About The Alien Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.