O-1B Dismissed โ Art (2021): did not establish the beneficiary met the required
Filing your own O-1B? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the required evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability in the arts. The AAO reviewed the evidence for several criteria, including serving as a lead participant in distinguished events, and concluded that the documentation did not satisfy any of them. For instance, while testimonial letters praised the beneficiary's curatorial work, they did not sufficiently establish that the exhibitions themselves had a distinguished reputation as required.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1B petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1B? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.