dismissed
O-1B
dismissed O-1B Case: Arts
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision and did not submit a brief or additional evidence as promised.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF C-C-A-0-M- APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: APR. 12,2018 PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner seeks to classify the Beneficiary as a foreign national of extraordinary ability in the arts. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(0)(i), 8 U.S.C. ยง 110l(a)(l5)(0)(i). This 0-1 classification makes nonimmigrant visas available to foreign nationals who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized m the field through extensive documentation. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An ofticer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned tails to identity specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specitically identities an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form l-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of tiling. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Maller of'C-C-A-0-M-, JD# 1143567 (AAO Apr. 12, 2018)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.