O-1B Dismissed โ Culinary Arts (2005): did not establish the beneficiary, a chef, met the required
Filing your own O-1B? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary, a chef, met the required evidentiary criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability in the arts. Although the director initially applied the wrong legal standard ('sustained acclaim' instead of 'distinction'), the AAO deemed this a harmless error. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence for national/international recognition, performance in a lead/starring role, or serving in a critical role for distinguished organizations.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1B petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1B? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.