O-1B Dismissed โ Dancesport (2016): did not establish the beneficiary's field, DanceSport
Filing your own O-1B? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary's field, DanceSport (competitive ballroom dancing), qualifies as a field of 'arts' for the O-1B classification. The evidence presented, including its recognition by the International Olympic Committee, suggested DanceSport is more appropriately considered an athletic competition, which would fall under the O-1A category with a different standard. The petitioner also did not satisfy the specific evidentiary requirements for the O-1B classification.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1B petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1B? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.