O-1B Dismissed โ Performing And Visual Arts (2001): the petitioner, a private investor, did not meet the
Filing your own O-1B? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a private investor, did not meet the regulatory requirements to act as an agent for the beneficiary. The director found that the petitioner was neither the beneficiary's employer nor a representative of both the beneficiary and his employers, and therefore lacked standing to file the petition. The AAO agreed with this assessment, noting that the petitioner's role as a patron or business representative did not satisfy the specific conditions for an agent outlined in 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(o)(2)(iv)(E).
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1B petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1B? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.