O-2 Dismissed — Athletics (2022): did not establish the beneficiaries, as content creators,

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiaries, as content creators, would be accompanying and assisting in the athletic performance of the O-1 athlete. The Director concluded the evidence showed the beneficiaries would be assisting the petitioner's management business in general, and failed to prove they had a critical prior working relationship, performed services integral to the O-1's actual performance, or possessed skills that a U.S. worker could not perform.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF