EB-1A Appeals: Construction & Real Estate

Last updated 2026-09-02

The AAO dismissed 85.7% of EB-1A appeals from Construction & Real Estate petitioners in published non-precedent decisions from 2005–2024 (n=21). The criterion most often at issue was Prizes or awards.

Outcomes by Year

YearDismissedSustainedRemandedTotal
20241 (—)012
20221 (—)001
20202 (—)013
20190 (—)011
20182 (—)002
20131 (—)001
20122 (—)002
20061 (—)001
20056 (—)006

Criteria Breakdown

CriterionIn DismissedIn SustainedTotalDismissal Rate
Prizes or awards14017—
Original contributions of major significance13015—
Judging12013—
Leading or critical role11013—
High salary or remuneration11012—
Membership in associations10012—
Published material about the alien11012—
Authorship of scholarly articles10011—

Example Decisions

Dismissed2024-12-05The appeal was dismissed primarily on procedural grounds, as the petitioner failed to argue why the Director's dismissal Dismissed2012-03-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary met the requisite number of evidenti Dismissed2005-12-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's sustained national or internationa Dismissed2005-12-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary, a tile and stone fabricator/in Dismissed2005-12-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit any documentation that related to any of the ten regula

Sample: published AAO non-precedent decisions collected from uscis.gov, 2005–2024. These are appeals, not all USCIS adjudications; approval rates here are not initial-filing approval rates. Read our full methodology.

Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria — free strategy preview.
Get Your Free Strategy Preview →