EB-2 NIW Appeals: Human Resources

Last updated 2026-09-02

The AAO dismissed 100.0% of EB-2 NIW appeals from Human Resources petitioners in published non-precedent decisions from 2018–2025 (n=50). The criterion most often at issue was Prong 1: Substantial merit and national importance.

Outcomes by Year

YearDismissedSustainedRemandedTotal
20253 (—)003
202420 (100.0%)0020
202321 (100.0%)0021
20222 (—)002
20212 (—)002
20201 (—)001
20181 (—)001

Criteria Breakdown

CriterionIn DismissedIn SustainedTotalDismissal Rate
Prong 1: Substantial merit and national importance48048100.0%
Prong 2: Well positioned to advance the endeavor30030100.0%
Prong 3: On balance, waiver benefits the U.S.27027100.0%
Exceptional ability20020100.0%
Advanced degree19019—

Example Decisions

Dismissed2024-10-25The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that their proposed endeavor as a human resources Dismissed2024-09-03The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove eligibility as an advanced degree professi Dismissed2024-07-09The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 immigrant classi Dismissed2024-06-04The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the 'national importance' of her proposed endeavor. Dismissed2024-04-25The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that her proposed human resources consulting busines

Sample: published AAO non-precedent decisions collected from uscis.gov. EB-2 NIW statistics reflect the Dhanasar framework era (2018–2025); the prior NYSDOT framework applied different legal standards. These are appeals, not all USCIS adjudications; approval rates here are not initial-filing approval rates. Read our full methodology.

Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria — free strategy preview.
Get Your Free Strategy Preview →