Can business owners and entrepreneurs get an O-1A? What 41 AAO decisions say

Published AAO non-precedent decisions, 2004–2025 · updated 2026-10-16

Between 2004 and 2025 the AAO published 41 O-1A appeal decisions from business & entrepreneurship petitioners and sustained none of them. The most common ground for dismissal: not shown to be among the small percentage at the top of the field (6 of the 34 merits dismissals, 18%). These are appeals of denials, not all adjudications, so the dismissal rate is not an initial-filing approval rate; it shows which arguments the AAO rejected on appeal and which it accepted.

What the decisions say

Grounds for dismissal, by frequency

  1. 6 of 34 Not shown to be among the small percentage at the top of the field
    “The AAO dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that the beneficiary is one of the small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of business.” AAO, 2013

No O-1A appeal from business & entrepreneurship petitioners was sustained in this period. The record shows what did not work; it does not show what would.

Outcomes by Year

YearDismissedSustainedRemandedTotal
20251 (—)001
20241 (—)001
20221 (—)012
20215 (—)005
20181 (—)001
20151 (—)001
201410 (—)0010
20134 (—)015
20112 (—)013
20092 (—)002
20072 (—)002
20061 (—)001
20043 (—)003

Criteria Breakdown

CriterionIn DismissedIn SustainedTotalDismissal Rate
Significant recognition26026100.0%
Awards or prizes2202588.0%
Sustained acclaim/extraordinary ability15018—
Membership in associations15017—
Published material15017—
High salary or remuneration13015—
Judging12014—
Leading or critical role12014—
Authorship of scholarly articles10012—

Example Decisions

Dismissed2025-02-20The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO rejected the petitioner's argument to submit 'comparable… Dismissed2024-09-19The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary met the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria. The AAO determined that articles authored by the beneficiary did not… Dismissed2022-03-23The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the original decision was incorrect. The petitioner did not prove the beneficiary met the 'membership in associations'… Dismissed2021-08-12The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria for an O-1A visa. The AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence… Dismissed2021-07-27The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove the beneficiary met the minimum evidentiary criteria for O-1A classification. The AAO found that the evidence submitted, such as a 2007 tourism award, was…

Sample: published AAO non-precedent decisions collected from uscis.gov, 2004–2025. These are appeals, not all USCIS adjudications; approval rates here are not initial-filing approval rates. Read our full methodology.

Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria — free strategy preview.
Get Your Free Strategy Preview →