dismissed EB-1A Case: Business
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification. The petitioner did not submit any documentation corresponding to the ten regulatory criteria, instead providing only personal statements, evidence of assets, and character letters, which were insufficient to prove he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1153(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED INSTRUCTIONS : This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to ed your case. -Any further inqu~ry must be made to that office. (/ Administrative Appeals Office Page 2 DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petitioner seeks classification as an alien of extraordinary ability in business pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 1153(b)(l)(A). The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim necessary to qualifL for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. On appeal, the petitioner submits his "Resume Objetive [sic]" and several letters attesting to his character. None of the letters address the regulatory criteria. Section 203(b) of the Act states, in pertinent part, that: (1) Priority Workers. -- Visas shall first be made available . . . to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following subparagraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with Extraordinary Ability. -- An alien is described in this subparagraph if -- (i) the alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics which has been demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive documentation, (ii) the alien seeks to enter the United States to continue work in the area of extraordinary ability, and (iii) the alien's entry to the United States will substantially benefit prospectively the United States. As used in this section, the term "extraordinary ability" means a level of expertise indicating that the individual is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor. 8 C.F.R. $ 204.5(h)(2). This petition seeks to classify the petitioner as an alien with extraordinary ability as a "business operations specialist." On Part 6 of the petition, the petitioner proposes to "buy, fix, administration [sic] and sell own properties and buildings commercial [sic]." The regulation at 8 C.F.R. $ 204.5(h)(3) indicates that an alien can establish sustained national or international acclaim through evidence of a one-time achievement (that is, a major, international recognized award). Barring the alien's receipt of such an award, the regulation outlines the following ten criteria, at least three of which must be satisfied for an alien to establish the sustained acclaim necessary to qualify as an alien of extraordinary ability. (i) Documentation of the alien's receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor; (ii) Documentation of the alien's membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields; (iii) Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought. Such evidence shall include the title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation; (iv) Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought; (v) Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field; (vi) Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media; (vii) Evidence of the display of the alien's work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases; (viii) Evidence that the alien has performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation; (ix) Evidence that the alien has commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services, in relation to others in the field; or (x) Evidence of commercial successes in the performing arts, as shown by box office receipts or record, cassette, compact disk, or video sales. It should be reiterated, however, that the petitioner must show that he has sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level. Initially, the petitioner submitted his personal statement, evidence of his real estate assets and bank statements. On January 27,2005, the director advised the petitioner of the ten regulatory criteria and requested evidence that the petitioner meets at least three of those criteria. In response, the petitioner submitted his personal statement regarding his previous discussions with immigration officials' and his history in real estate. He also submitted evidence that he had made an appointment with Citizenship Immigration Services' Miami Customer Service Center and a lawsuit he filed. The director concluded that the petitioner had failed to submit evidence of the petitioner's sustained national or 1 The petitioner asserts that he was initially advised to apply for the classification now sought and was subsequently advised to file a Form 1-526, Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur, because his assets were above $500,000. We discuss the petitioner's eligibility for the classification sought in the body of this decision. We further note that classification as an alien entrepreneur does not simply require assets above $500,000 and refer the petitioner to Section 203(b)(5) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. 4 204.6. Page 4 international acclaim. On appeal, the petitioner submitted a personal statement and letters attesting to his character. None of these letters address the ten regulatory criteria for the classification sought listed on the instructions to the Form 1-140 petition and provided to the petitioner in the director's request for additional evidence. The statute requires extensive documentation to establish eligibility for this classification. The regulations require that an alien of extraordinary ability be able to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Assuming that the petitioner is a talented property manager, the record does not reflect that he has attained any national acclaim for that talent. Specifically, the petitioner has not submitted documentation that relates to any of the ten regulatory criteria. The documentation submitted in support of a claim of extraordinary ability must clearly demonstrate that the alien has achieved sustained national or international acclaim and is one of the small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor. Review of the record, however, does not establish that the petitioner has distinguished himself as a property manager to such an extent that he may be said to have achieved sustained national or international acclaim or to be within the small percentage at the very top of his field. Therefore, the petitioner has not established the petitioner's eligibility pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Act and the petition may not be approved. The burden of proof in visa petition proceedings remains entirely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1361. Here, the petitioner has not sustained that burden. Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.