dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Business
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was improperly filed. The person who filed the appeal was the beneficiary of the petition, who is not considered an "affected party" with legal standing to file an appeal under 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). As the appeal was not filed by the petitioner, it was rejected without a review of its merits.
Criteria Discussed
Proper Filing Of An Appeal Legal Standing To File An Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass Ave.. N.W., Rrn. A3042 Washington. DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration FILE: EAC 04 033 50279 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: && 2 d 2005 IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. %bert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office EAC 04 033 50279 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be rejected as improperly filed. The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in business. The director determined the petitioner had not established that the beneficiary qualifies for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the affected party must file the complete appeal within 30 days of after service of the unfavorable decision. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B) states that the "'affected party' (in addition to the Service) means the person or entity with legal standing in a proceeding. It does not include the beneficiary of a visa petition." 8 C.F.R. 8 103.3(a)(2)(v) states: Improperly $led appeal -- (A) Appeal $led by person or entity not entitled to file it -- (I) Rejection without refund offiling fee. An appeal filed by a person or entity not entitled to file it must be rejected as improperly filed. In such a case, any filing fee the Service has accepted will not be refunded. The appeal has not been filed by the petitioner, nor by any entity with legal standing in the proceeding, but rather by the beneficiary.' Therefore, as the appeal has not been properly filed, it must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 1 ~ttorne~ who prepared and signed the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal, has submitted a Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative, signed by the beneficiary only.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.