dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Business
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit any arguments or evidence to support it. After requesting a 90-day extension to file documentation, counsel did not submit anything for over 15 months, thus failing to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 Washington, DC 20529 pu~~Ic copy U. S. Citizenship and Immigration identifying data deleted to Services pnvmt clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy v- EAC 05 207 50441 PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. -/+ hobert P. Wiemann, Chief / Administrative Appeals Office Page 2 DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in business. The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. On appeal, counsel states: "I am presently engaged in a trial, and I am requesting at least 90 days to file the supporting documentation for this appeal." The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(h)(3). The appeal was filed on June 8, 2006. As of this date, more than 15 months later, the AAO has received nothing further. As stated in 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.