EB-1A Dismissed โ Peking Opera: did not establish he met the minimum three regulatory
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he met the minimum three regulatory criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The evidence for his national awards was found insufficient, as there was no proof of their significance, some were for youth or regional competitions, and the acclaim was not shown to be sustained. Additionally, the petitioner did not establish that his membership in an association required outstanding achievements for admission.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.