Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Peking Opera (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The petitioner stated an intent to submit a brief and evidence but failed to do so within the specified time, providing no arguments or new evidence to address the denial.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sustained National Or International Acclaim Failure To Submit Arguments Or Evidence Addressing Regulatory Criteria
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.