Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Peking Opera: the evidence provided did not meet the regulatory
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence provided did not meet the regulatory requirements. The petitioner's awards were deemed local rather than national or international, and evidence of the significance of other prizes was not provided. Furthermore, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his memberships in associations required outstanding achievement, and the evidence of his role as a judge lacked detail about the level of expertise of those he evaluated.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Receipt Of Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations Which Require Outstanding Achievements Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.