Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Business (2009): the director's initial denial was based on the factually
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director's initial denial was based on the factually incorrect finding that no supporting evidence was submitted. The AAO determined that the petitioner did submit evidence, but the director failed to properly analyze it against the relevant regulatory criteria. The case was sent back to the service center for a new decision that properly addresses the evidence on record.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Receipt Of Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Alien In Professional Or Major Trade Publications Or Other Major Media
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.