EB-1A Sustained — Applied Mechanics And Composite Materials: the AAO found the petitioner satisfied at least three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied at least three criteria for extraordinary ability. The decision highlights the petitioner's role as a judge of the work of others, evidenced by his review of proposals for the National Academies and the National Science Foundation, as well as textbooks for major publishers. Furthermore, the petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through the development of a novel solution to a long-standing multiple-scattering problem and a new computational system, as confirmed by laudatory letters from distinguished professors.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.