Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Applied Mechanics And Composite Materials: the AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to meet at least three of the regulatory criteria. The decision details how the petitioner satisfied the criteria for judging the work of others, through his review of proposals for national academies and academic textbooks, and for making original contributions of major significance to his field, which were detailed in letters from experts.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.