sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Applied Mechanics And Composite Materials
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to meet at least three of the regulatory criteria. The decision details how the petitioner satisfied the criteria for judging the work of others, through his review of proposals for national academies and academic textbooks, and for making original contributions of major significance to his field, which were detailed in letters from experts.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.