sustained EB-1A Case: Fashion Model
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner met three of the required evidentiary criteria. The petitioner provided sufficient evidence of published material about his work in major media, the display of his work in artistic showcases like advertising campaigns, and proof that he commanded a high salary in relation to others in the field. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded this evidence established that the petitioner had achieved sustained national or international acclaim and was at the top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.