sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Information Systems
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner established eligibility by meeting at least three of the required regulatory criteria. The director had already acknowledged the petitioner met the criteria for judging the work of others and authorship of scholarly articles, and the AAO further determined that the petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance to the field.
Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Iv) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(V) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Vi)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.