EB-1A Sustained โ Music (2020): the AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the evidence. The AAO determined the petitioner did meet at least three criteria, including published material in major media, judging the work of others, and display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, disagreeing with the Director's narrow interpretation of the regulations. Based on the totality of the evidence, the AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.