sustained EB-1A Case: Polymer Science
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner met three of the required evidentiary criteria, including contributions of major significance, authorship of scholarly articles, and judging the work of others. While the Director had only accepted two criteria, the AAO also credited the petitioner's work as a peer reviewer and on an editorial board. After a final merits determination, the AAO concluded the petitioner had demonstrated the necessary sustained national or international acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.