dismissed
EB-1C
dismissed EB-1C Case: Bakery Equipment
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact as required. The petitioner indicated they would submit a brief and additional evidence but failed to do so, thus not overcoming the director's finding that the beneficiary's employment abroad and proposed employment in the U.S. were not established as qualifying managerial or executive positions.
Criteria Discussed
Qualifying Managerial Or Executive Capacity
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifyingdatadeletedto preventclearlyunwarranted invasionof personalprivacy PUBLICCOPY U.S.Departmentof HomelandSecurity U. S.CitizenshipandImmigrationServices AdministrativeAppealsOffice(AAO) 20MassachuseusAve N.W.,MS2090 Washington,DC 20529-2090 U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services DATE: AUG 0 8 2012 OFFICE:TEXASSERVICECENTER IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: ImmigrantPetitionfor AlienWorkerasaMultinationalExecutiveor ManagerPursuantto Section203(b)(1)(C)of theimmigrationandNationalityAct, 8U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(1)(C) ONBEHALFOFPETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosedpleasefind thedecisionof theAdministrativeAppealsOffice in yourcase.All of thedocuments relatedto this matterhavebeenreturnedto theofficethatoriginallydecidedyourcase.Pleasebeadvised thatanyfurtherinquirythatyoumighthaveconcerningyourcasemustbemadeto thatotTice. If you believethe AAO inappropriatelyappliedthe law in reachingits decision,or you haveadditional informationthatyouwishto haveconsidered,youmayfile a motionto reconsideror a motionto reopenin accordancewith theinstructionson FormI-290B,Noticeof Appealor Motion,with a feeof $630. The specificrequirementsfor filing sucha motioncanbe foundat 8 C.F.R.§ 103.5.Do not file any motion directlywith theAAO. Pleasebeawarethat8C.F.R.§ 103.5(a)(1)(i)requiresanymotionto befiledwithin 30daysof thedecisionthatthemotionseeksto reconsideror reopen. Thankyou, PerryRhew Chief,AdministrativeAppealsOffice www.uscis.gov Page2 DISCUSSION:Thepreferencevisapetitionwasdeniedby the Director,TexasServiceCenter. Thematteris nowbeforetheAdministrativeAppealsOffice (AAO) on appeal.Theappealwill be summarilydismissed. Thepetitionerstatesthatitstypeof businessis "commercializebakeryequipments,"andit seeksto employthe beneficiaryasits GeneralManager. Accordingly,thepetitionerendeavorsto classify the beneficiary as an employment-basedimmigrant pursuantto section 203(b)(1)(C) of the ImmigrationandNationalityAct (theAct), 8 U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(1)(C),asa multinationalexecutive or manager. On January7, 2011,the directordeniedthe immigrantpetitionconcludingthatpetitionerfailedto establishthatboththebeneficiary'semploymentabroadwith theforeigncompanyandtheproposed employmentwith theU.S.entityarewithin aqualifyingmanagerialor executivecapacity. OnJanuary24,2011,thepetitionersubmittedtheFormI-290Bto appealthedirector'sdenial. The petitionermarkedthebox atparttwo of theFormI-290Bto indicatethatthebrief and/oradditional evidencewill besubmittedto theAAOwithin30days.Theappealbriefwasneverreceivedby the AAO, thus,theAAO deemstherecordcompleteandreadyfor adjudication. An officer to whom an appealis taken shall summarilydismiss any appealwhen the party concernedfails to identifyspecificallyanyerroneousconclusionof law or statementof fact for the appeal.8 C.FR.§ 103.3(a)(1)(v). In regardsto the director'sconclusionthat the petitionerfailed to submitsufficient evidenceto showthe beneficiary'seligibility for the immigrantpetition, the petitionerfails to identify any erroneousconclusionof law or statementof fact for the appeal. The petitionerclaimedthat the immigrantvisa petition shouldbe grantedbut did not provideany evidenceto corroboratethat claim. As no additionalevidenceis presentedon appealto overcomethe decisionof thedirector, theappealwill besummarilydismissedin accordancewith 8 C.F.R.§ 103.3(a)(1)(v). Theburdenof proof in theseproceedingsrestssolelywith the petitioner. Section291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C.§ 1361.Thepetitionerhasnot sustainedthatburden. ORDER: Theappealissummarilydismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.