EB-1C Dismissed — Business Investments And Trade: the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact as required. The AAO also agreed with the director's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate the beneficiary was employed abroad or would be employed in the U.S. in a primarily managerial or executive capacity.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF