EB-1C Dismissed — Chemical Wholesale (2006): the petitioner's counsel provided only general, unsupported

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel provided only general, unsupported objections to the director's findings. The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner failed to establish a qualifying relationship, that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity, and that the company had the ability to pay the proffered wage. The AAO also found that while a procedural error (not issuing an RFE) may have occurred, it would not have changed the outcome as there was evidence of ineligibility in the record regarding the qualifying relationship.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF