EB-1C Dismissed — Computer Products Distribution (2005): the petitioner's central argument regarding improper

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner's central argument regarding improper revocation notice was rendered moot by a new law. The petitioner argued the revocation was invalid because the beneficiary was already in the U.S. and was not notified before his journey, but the AAO pointed to a recent, retroactive amendment to Section 205 of the Act which eliminated that specific notification requirement, thus upholding the director's decision to revoke.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF