EB-1C Dismissed — Fashion Watches: the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The petitioner's general claims, including one of ineffective assistance of counsel, were deemed insufficient and did not meet the procedural requirements for an appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF