EB-1C Dismissed — Import/Export (2007): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusions of law or fact made by the director. The AAO also affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, noting the job description was vague and included non-qualifying duties. Additionally, the AAO found that the record did not establish that the U.S. employer had been doing business for at least one year prior to filing the petition.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF