EB-1C Dismissed — Information Technology (2007): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The underlying petition was denied because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary's duties, both abroad and in the U.S., were primarily managerial or executive, as the job descriptions included significant non-managerial technical tasks, and the petitioner failed to provide a requested breakdown of time spent on each duty.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF