dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: It And Cyber Security

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 It And Cyber Security

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the initial denial. Although the petitioner stated an intent to submit a brief or additional evidence, they failed to do so.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact

View Full Decision Text

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF S-l-G- INC. 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 3, 2018 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM l-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, an IT and cyber security consulting company, seeks to seeks to permanently employ 
the Beneticiary as an executive vice president and group CISO under the first preference immigrant 
classitication for multinational executives or managers. ·See Immigration and Nationality Act (the 
Act) section 203(b )( 1 )(C), 8 U .S.C. § 1 I 53(b )( 1 )(C). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center 
denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily 
dismiss the appeal. 
An ofticer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identities an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form l-290B. Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of filing. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. 
Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of 
fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § l03.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of'S-1-G-!NC, 10# 1383985 (AAO Apr. 3, 2018)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.